Australias Involvement in the Vietnam War essays

Australia's Involvement in the Vietnam War essays The origins of the Vietnam War lie in the post World War II period when the European empires were being dismantled. The region which is now Vietnam was then part of Indo-China, part of the French empire. Revolutionary leader Ho Chi Minh had led a national liberation struggle against wartime Japanese occupation (and the French colonialists) from 1941. With military and financial support from communist China, the Viet Minh made substantial gains, roundly defeating the French at Dien Bien Phu in 1954. Vietnam temporarily partitioned into North and South pending the outcome of peace talks. The peace talks broke down, but the struggle continued. The United States had been involved from the beginning, providing military advisors and financial assistance from the end of World War II. By 1954 they were paying for 80% of the cost of the French effort. American involvement was formalised and strengthened. Following the Gulf of Tonkin incident when US destroyers were fired upon by North Korean patrol boats, Congress authorised President Johnson to use all necessary measures to repel any armed attack on 7 August 1964. This resulted in increased bombing raids and, more significantly, an expansion of ground forces, from 23 000 in December 1964, to 316 400 by October 1966. Australias involvement began in 1962 when, in response to a request from the government of South Vietnam, Australia sent 30 military advisers to train and improve the effectiveness of South Vietnams Army. By 1965 this had been increased to 100 advisors plus six transport aircraft. That year, after a further request from the South Vietnamese Government, Prime Minister Robert Menzies decided to send a battalion of ground troops to provide support in South Vietnam. According to Menzies statement of April 29 1965, The takeover of South Vietnam would be a direct military threat to Australia and to all the countries of South and South-Eas...

Why I Agree with the Libertarian Party Essay Example

Why I Agree with the Libertarian Party Essay Example Why I Agree with the Libertarian Party Essay Why I Agree with the Libertarian Party Essay Essay Topic: On Liberty We live in a nation founded on Liberty. The Purpose of the founding of the United States was to preserve the individual freedoms of its citizens while providing a fair governing body. Their slogan Minimum Government Maximum Freedom describes my exact feelings when dealing with how to run a country by Freedom. The Libertarian Party represents me because they believe in Minimum Government and Maximum Freedom. The Libertarian Party represents me because they believe in Minimum Government and Maximum Freedom. One issue that I agree with the Libertarian Party is when dealing with the economy. The party believes that a free market economy is the best, and want to do their best to support the individual rights of business entities such as corporations, cooperatives, and voluntary business entities. However, they do not believe in direct government involvement in the economy. Libertarians believe the government has no place subsidizing businesses or bailing them out. This also goes along with the belief that government has no place competing with private industry such as healthcare or education. Libertarians firmly believe that the job of the government in an economy is to combat fraud and to produce a trusted currency. Not only do they believe government should have minimal interference in the economy, Libertarians also think that government should stay out of Labor Markets. Libertarians beli eve that unions should be separated from the government, and that government should not be in charge of what is defined as a fair wage for work being done. Not only do I agree with the Libertarian Party in domestic economics I also agree with their standpoint on foreign issues. The Libertarian Party represents me because they believe in Minimum Government and Maximum Freedom. I agree with their standpoint on foreign policy in many different issues. One issue that I agree with them is that the United States should not be policing the world. Libertarians t

Trace the origins of H.R.M. and show how it has impacted on todays Essay

Trace the origins of H.R.M. and show how it has impacted on todays workforce - Essay Example Later was the formation of Welfare Workers Association, whose purpose was to bring out a Chartered institute of Personnel and Development. During World War I, there was a shift of the name from industrial welfare to Recruitment and Selection. There was a call to by the government to increase the use of individuals as well as starting girls-engagement during the First World War. In 1916, it was made compulsory for the existence of a welfare worker in the explosive firms where a lot of work was accomplished by the army majorly focused on ability and IQ testing ways and techniques. In 1921, result on the tests, interview methods, and training techniques were established and published by the psychologist of the national institute (Marciano, 1995). During World War II, the focus was based on a lot of issues hence the need to establish personnel department having well-skilled and competitive staff who were charged with recruitment, selection, and training. They also had to ensure improved worker morale and motivation, health and safety of the worker, maintain discipline in the workforce, better wage policies as well as ensuring joint consultations between workers and management. Later on, the name was changed to Industrial Relations. As a result of the widespread of the consultations, the personnel department was then held responsible for organizational and administrative roles and was to act as the business’s spokesman on discussions with trade unions. Therefore, there was the need for specialists to deal with issues of industrial relations, which paved way for the industrial relations, its specialists, and its collective importance as it was witnessed in 1970’s negotiations after the reinforcement; the personnel manager was left in the authority on negotiations pertaining to wage pay among other collective issues (Armstrong, 2012). Still in the 1970’s, due to an increase